At first I was shocked when I read the first section of the Community Based Marketing book -information based campaigns don’t work. Wow! Numerous studies have proven that education alone has little to no impact. And, the idea that we only need to provide something according to economic self-interest has also been largely proven unsuccessful. There has been so much money and time spent on developing campaigns such as this that this fact is difficult to digest. However, what it tells me is that in many cases we have been and are still heading in the wrong direction. Changing behavior or shifting culture is difficult and doesn’t rely solely on education and money.
So, if we don’t change because we know it is better or it financially pays off, how are we going to actually shift behavior? This leads into the topics covered in Chapter 3 in Roseland - community policy. I’ve tried to understand what allows some places to become those unique fabulous places while others don’t. One location that comes to mind is Sanibel Island, with its lack of tacky signage, annoying lighting, obtrusive billboards, etc. Sanibel didn’t become this way because each and every business owner said; we are going to do this to better the environment of Sanibel. True, some may have done exactly this, but I’m betting the majority of businesses have done it because they were required. Many businesses would prefer the lighting and large signage to increase visibility and thus increase business. Sanibel is the way it is because of the policies that are in place to actually protect what makes it special.
Then, I think about my hometown of Columbus, IN. For those of you that don’t know, Columbus is prized for its architecture- prized so much that it actually ranks 6th in the United States for architectural innovation and design by the American Institute of Architects. (If you have never been, I recommend you take a day trip and go on the architecture tour, or wait a few months and go on the architecture tour by bike we are trying to organize). Columbus became the special place it is because one man had a vision- J. Irwin Miller. That one man had a lot of money and worked tirelessly to create the beautiful spaces. Because of the historic architecture, some of the buildings have been protected and maintained. However, what about the rest of the City? Why is everything not as well planned and designed as the North Christian Church? In my opinion it comes down to the community policies. The current policies have allowed for urban sprawl, big box stores, few trees, etc.
If a visionary like J. Irwin Miller had such a passion, why wasn’t this passion carried out into all elements of the community? We must change the policies in order to change our culture. It is human nature to do otherwise. Trust me, people in Columbus prize the architecture- but money, time, convenience, and creativity also play a large role in development. No one will tell you they love the Wal-mart, Menard’s and Sam’s Club sprawl development that has occurred west of town, but they allowed it to happen.
If we are to change policies in order to shift our culture into more sustainable living, how are we going to undo what has already been done? And, is it sustainable to do so? We have turned precious agriculture land into neighborhoods connected to nothing. In order to connect them to something we have to take up even more precious agricultural land. Yes, maybe our current community policies address the new and the redeveloped, but what about the mistakes that have already been made? Policy will have to address those areas in order to truly shift culture, because shifting culture does not happen if it is only occurs within a small portion of a society.
Correcting the mistakes of the past is a big concern of mine, too. The mind boggles at what it might take to re-design cities and small communities to a more sustainable form, and if it is that difficult, is it worth it?
ReplyDeleteOkay, so I had to say something, because Sanibel Island holds a really big place in my heart. My two older sisters got married on its beaches, and every time I go to Florida I love to go out there. It is such a beautiful place. Okay, enough nostalgia; now back to the main point.
ReplyDeleteAnyway, I agree that a change in local policy is a must in order to rectify the mistakes of the past. I'm not sure how, exactly, to go about it besides local policy, but it definitely is an issue of concern.
I think the first step to stop this movement would be to make it more difficult for developers to purchase agricultural land. I don't know if sales taxes for these types of properties could increase or how that would work. Then next step would be to give incentives for those same developers utilize the space already urbanized to create more living and bringing the city closer together. I agree that this is a huge problem that needs to be addresses with all cities. This is a local problem occurring in most cities in the US.
ReplyDeleteLaura I couldn't agree more with your feeling of "mind befuddlement". HaHa, but seriously... As I read Chapter 3 in Roseland, I couldn't help but to wonder what is keeping municipalities all over the United States from adopting some of these regulations. At first, I thought that maybe because some of these policies are so new and recently enacted that we are in a sort of grace period where many local officials are waiting to see if they work over the long run. However, there are other examples that have passed what I would consider a 5-year efficiency test, yet we still aren't seeing widespread adoption. So then, I thought about the possibility that the information isn't traveling fast enough. Despite living in a time that may one day be referred to as the "Age of Information", maybe the info is not in the right place at the right time. We can only expect so much from our elected officials and their aides. By this I mean, maybe they aren't coming across the successful examples when they seek a new policy to pursue. If that is the case, then I would like to see more referendum voting in states other than California. It seems as though many are afraid of putting the power into the hands of the people, but when so few care to even vote nowadays maybe the power would end up in the hands of people who did care. Just one way that things might actually get accomplished. Anything is better than just "Sitting, Waiting, and Wishing".
ReplyDeleteI was also (unpleasantly) surprised to find that educational pamphlets and brochures oftentimes have little or no lasting effect on those who read them. It really seems that people are most directly influenced by the ease with which they can implement a change in their life; regardless of if they are educated about the issue or not, if the desired behavior change isn't "easy" to accomplish, education alone is rarely going to make the person change their personal habits.
ReplyDeleteYes, information-only campaigns don't work. No matter how much we spend on them. Yet we keep doing them.
ReplyDeleteCan you raise chickens on Sanibel Island? I see you can't feed aligators . . .
What, if anything, is Bloomington doing to attempt to slow sprawl? Sanibel Island? Columbus?
Are there examples of communities where sprawl has been stopped or greatly slowed? How did they do it?